John said ... > The MoQ is an ideal we strive to instantiate, not an image to be captured in > stone. > > And if it ever is captured in stone, it will be the task of the noble > iconoclast to knock it over. Or put another way, if you meet Buddha on the > road ... get his autograph. He'll die laughing.
Ian says, you're my kinda "intellectual boy" John ;-) The argument I've been having with Bo for as long as I can remember - 6 or 7 maybe 8 years now - is that if he "fixes" intellect as SOM, he casts its future evolution in stone. The very antithesis of MoQ. I know some feel we "pick on" Bo, but if we are looking for someone who doesn't get it ... still crazy after all these years ... Ian Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
