On Jan 15, 2010, at 2:55 AM, markhsmit wrote: > Hi Marsha, > Are we still referring to Quality at that which represents something > being better than another and its expression through increasing > betterness? Or are we getting more mystical? > > I just want to get on the same plane as you. > > Mark
Mark, I can over complicate with the best of them. Nearest my heart is Quality(unpatterned experience and patterned experience.) Marsha > > On Jan 14, 2010, at 5:28:53 PM, "X Acto" <[email protected]> wrote: > Marsha: > You've got one sad ego. > > You are satisfied with the MoQ as a theory. I am satisfied with the MoQ > representing > insight and experience. I do not know if what Bo says is based on experience > or > not. For me, Quality IS reality; Quality being unpatterned experience and > patterned experience. So maybe the MoQ is both theory and experience. > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ _______________________________________________________________________ Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars... Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
