On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 9:41 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
Namely if Pirsig's Quality/MOQ meta- > > metaphysics that Steve wields is logically valid? That there is a > QUALITY other than the DQ of the MOQ and independent of it? For > instance if there comes a "metaphysics" that rejects the MOQ it is still > a "MOQ"? > I just wanted to pop in again with my proposal about the difference between DQ and Quality. DQ is the experience of Quality, or Quality's instantiation at the individual level. Does that clear it all up now? Good, Once again, you're welcome. John Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
