[Arlo previously] And so long as 2) you COULD choose that, there must 3.5) exist some probability you will, even if its infinitely tiny.
[Craig] But again what is the argument that 2) [or 3)] entails 3.5? I have provided an argument for my position that shows premise 3.5) is unnecessary. You have just asserted 3.5) without any proof of its relevance. [Arlo] Its relevance is that it must be so. You might want to avoid it in your bullet points, but it is there or else you would be unable to claim 2). You are using it as a foundation, and then saying its irrelevant to what you say. I am simply saying, what you say is true, but its dishonest not to acknowledge the foundation that makes it so. [Craig] What can you conclude? [Arlo] I can conclude that as an agent freely able to act on the uncertain, your choice is not certain, but freely probable. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
