dmb said:
The unpatterned experience, for example, can be called the undifferentiated 
aesthetic continuum, the pre-conceptual reality, the primary empirical reality, 
pure experience, pre-reflective experience, immediate experience, noncognitive 
experience, pre-verbal experience, the immediate flux of life and the cutting 
edge of experience.
Krimel replied:
What's left over? What you have here seems like more than 90% of human 
experience. The rest of experience you describe as, "...static, conceptual, 
verbal, cognitive, reflective, intelligible and differentiated." Isn't that 
mostly just the idle chatter our verbal brain does to pass the time while the 
non-verbal part is living and keeping us alive, driving us to the store, 
talking to our spouses, washing the dishes...

dmb says:

You use your non-verbal brain to talk to your wife? Sounds like quite a trick. 
But yea, the rituals and routines of life are sort of given over to the 
autopilot. Once we've learned and mastered a certain task, that "knowledge" 
fades into the background so that we don't have to be thoughtful or deliberate 
about tying our shoes or brushing our teeth. That sort of thing might count as 
unpatterned in SOME sense but then again we are talking about thought habits 
and patterns of behavior. 


Krimel asked:How does you unpatterned experience differ from Freud's 
unconscious or Gazzanaga's non-conscious?

dmb says:

Don't know about Gazzanaga but I have read some Freud. His notion of the 
unconscious was very different from this. It was the home of primal instincts 
and all the repressed material that was too ugly to see the light of day. You 
know, a life full of fucking and killing is what we really want, he thought. 
The unconscious both the source of these motivates and the place where their 
true nature is hidden from the conscious mind. All of human culture, he 
thought, is nothing but the sublimation of these instincts toward sex and 
aggression. We dress them up in fancy clothes to make them seem sublime. Things 
like romantic love and a warrior's courage are really just window dressing for 
basic animal drives. His unconscious has a specific structure and function. 
He's also a kind of reductionist.
This notion of an unpatterned, pre-intellectual experience goes in the opposite 
direction. While it's true that in both cases we're talking about something 
that is not conscious, preverbal experience is not about instincts or 
repression or anything like that. If it HAD to be described in terms of a 
structure of the mind (at gun point, say), I'd point to the brain's right 
hemisphere. As opposed to the differentiations of thought and language, it has 
a all-at-once way of processing "things" resulting in an undifferentiated 
awareness. Remember the Harvard brain scientist named Jill Bolte Taylor? When 
she only had that hemisphere working, due to a stroke, she experienced nirvana, 
she says. If the two hemisphere can be correlated to the dynamic-static split 
(big IF), then it does have some structural basis that we can point to. But I 
really don't know if that works because that could get pretty reductionist too.
Think of that analogy in ZAMM where our our understanding of the world 
(conceptual, static world) is just a handful of sand from all the endless 
beaches. The thing to notice here is how much bigger the unheld sand is. You 
can't reduce your handful to that. The contemporary pragmatists express the 
same same idea, I think, when they talk about this kind of experience as 
"rich", "thick", "overflowing" and maybe even "inexhaustible". And they talk 
about the concepts and ideas derived from it in terms of "takings" rather than 
reflections or representations. In this proportional sense, concepts are 
derived from the pre-intellectual reality the way a cup of salt water is 
derived from the ocean. Our concepts "take" a tiny, tiny fraction of what could 
be taken. Just a handful of sand. 
Maybe I'll check out the podcast. Thanks.

  
http://www.learnoutloud.com/Catalog/Self-Development/Emotional-Development/Human-Emotion-Podcast/19719
 





                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390707/direct/01/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to