John,
> Wow!  Dude!  I've never witnessed an analogistic attack upon an ontogeny as
> pedophilic before....  The Sophists would salute you with the full triple
> Rimmer on this one I think.  I don't know what to say... I'm anxious to read
> Ham's reply.

Merely learning to adapt to the dynamic, zany, anything goes, whatever you
feel culture. The first thing that came into my mind upon reading this was
exactly what I put down. No analysis, no research, dynamic stream of
consciousness gut reaction. Will he be pissed, of course, will he be
justified, yes. But this is all about fun, polemics, rhetorical bombast,
isn't it?  Just trying to fit in.

Dave

>> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to