On 1/31/10 1:22 PM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
<snip> The social level was - still is - all about controlling/quelling biological value, nothing about mindish ideas or knowledge shared or anything of this intellect looking down upon creation through its subjective, mind, consciousness ... etc. glasses. This is about the MOQ looking down at the static levels! When will this dawn on you? The SOL is unassailable and when it can't be refuted people turn mean. For instance Ron and Andre with their once creepy "agreement with Bo" and then with equal creepy psychological attacks, Bo just defending some cerebrity position ...etc. Well, it can be helped, when you can't win the ball, attack the player. Bodvar Hi Bo and all, Evolution as levels in existence creates a moral hierarchy. Imho the social level is out of place in the hierarchy Pirsig proposes. As I read the above description of the social level I surmise an anthill or beehive as the model for a level of instinctive motivation migrating intact to a level of conscious motivation without first considering the evolution of the conscious individual in a family. The analogy from instinctive behavior of ants and bees does not translate to the conscious behavior of a social individual sentient except analogously. I don¹t think metaphysics is about analogies. I think the motivation from evolution in the consciousness of the individual sentient moving to an indefinable emotional level from an organic level has a better chance of controlling his environment through a conscious decision rather than appealing to an analogy of mechanical instinct found in a beehive or anthill. Joe > The social level was - still is - all about controlling/quelling biological > value, nothing about mindish ideas or knowledge shared or > anything of this intellect looking down upon creation through its > subjective, mind, consciousness ... etc. glasses. This is about the > MOQ looking down at the static levels! When will this dawn on you? > The SOL is unassailable and when it can't be refuted people turn > mean. For instance Ron and Andre with their once creepy "agreement > with Bo" and then with equal creepy psychological attacks, Bo just > defending some cerebrity position ...etc. > > Well, it can be helped, when you can't win the ball, attack the player. > > Bodvar > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
