Steve said to John:
I appologize. I sholdn't have butted in. I just wanted to express my annoyance
at DMB's apparent need to jump all over Matt K at all costs even it if means
heartily agreeing with "Phlbttt."
dmb says:
Actually, I don't even know what "Phlbttt" means and I so can't agree heartily
or otherwise. And how do you figure I was jumping all over Matt? At all costs?
Please. How was that post anything other than a normal disagreement? In fact, I
downplayed John's criticism of Matt's professional "style" and instead moved to
the substance of the argument, or what I take it to be anyway. And what about
that? Nobody bothers with the substance of the dispute but it's okay to take
time for this miss manners nonsense?
Be nice if we could focus more on the content and less on our delicate
sensibilities.
I'll ask you the same question I asked John. Overreact much?
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469226/direct/01/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
