Arlo to Steve: And the "common projects" are education, politics and law. I don't think (and you can call me naive) that if this was just about someone standing on the street corner espousing the divinity of the Great Pumpkin I don't think many people would stop and demand evidence. And if Focus on the Pumpkinpatch published a book extolling the that the Great Pumpkin carved the earth in late October only a few hundred years ago, I doubt many would be up in arms demanding evidence.
Andre: Nice post Arlo. I have been thinking about this 'freedom of speech' as a hard-fought-for intellectual PoV. It seems to me ,in keeping with the MoQ, that anyone wishing to make use of this intellectual PoV should do so morally. To wit: not use this Intell. PoV to further, spread or promote a social PoV. Thus following your example, claiming the right to free speech (an intellectual PoV) by advocating the divinity of the Great Pumpkin ( a social PoV) is immoral. Is this making sense or am I missing something? Andre Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
