John says: I vote Platt's explanation, Platt says: I would argue that even though DQ cannot be captured by S/O intellectual verbal patterns it can be captured by art (including poetry) when the artwork provides a glimpse of the "indeterminate divine."
Andre: I would agree to a certain extent (it appears to me that Platt has not worked out the relationship between DQ and SQ yet, he is totally misguided) but never mind. What pisses me off is that Platt dares to come up with such wonderful 'insights' and adheres to his carpet bombing, neo- conservative, Fox inspired slants. I find these creepy and figure that Platt is like an eel in a bucket with nothing but snot! Goebbles!!!!!!!!! The fucking sheep in terrible disguise.!!! An absolute disgrace to this discuss!!! Yours truly! You can throw me off this discuss if you want to but Platt's statements fill me with the urge to defecate! He is an insult to this discuss and the MoQ. See yous later!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
