> Mary: > > SOL = subject-object logic. > SOM = subject-object metaphysics. > > My dog uses SOL but will never study SOM. > > SOL is the tool and SOM is the interpretation. Looked at this way, the > door > is still open for some other interpretation to supplant SOM. IMO, all > Western metaphysics is some variation on SOM. > > > > SOL, on the other hand, is the underlying mechanism of brain function > that > developed in the Biological Level which separates us from each other > and > from everything else. It is fundamental to all thinking species and > requires extreme effort and practice to overcome - to the extent that > it can > be overcome at all. > > Ron: > If SOL is the underlying mechanism of brain function that developed the > biological level, why on earth would we seek to reform a subject / > object > metaphysics? > [Mary Replies] Gee Ron, I thought we were here discussing the MoQ? Doesn't the MoQ kind of point out the weaknesses of S/O metaphysics? Maybe what was developed in the Biological Level is not the BEST way to view reality? Geez, man, if you are going to argue about this, then go find a Kantian discuss list maybe?
Thanks, Mary Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
