Hi Marsha, gav, et al I thought gav's summing was pretty good. I tend to say non-theistic - not recognizing any need for objective division into individuals (I, god or gods) to use your language - but nevertheless an acceptance of the mystical in the whole (kinda Spinoza's pantheism in gav's suggestion).
Then (as gav also suggests) there is no reason to take any particularly "anti" theist position - at least not as a matter of principle - we will still of course want to take exception to specific things particular theists and theisms do and say. That sound about right ? I think it gets interesting again - given that acceptance of the mystical - when we start to talk about the nature of belief and (that dreaded word) faith. (ie in what and on what basis) Ian On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:14 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I've always thought of the moq as an atheistic, anti-thesitic place where > I might be a religious person who doesn't believe in god, or better yet, > a place without such divisions as I and god. > > > > > > > ___ > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
