On Mar 12, 2010, at 9:32 AM, Andre Broersen wrote: > > Marsha, the 'mystical' IS direct experience, it is religious. It is a > binding together...the state before the unbound, before subjects and > objects, before the divisions. To say that 'it can be directly > experienced' is not correct. It is direct experience. > And those that have had this experience and spread their findings and > learnings have been turned into gods and 'mystics' themselves around > which static patterns of faith have arisen.
Greetings Andre, Yes, the 'mystical' IS direct experience, it is religious. It is a binding together... the state before the unbound, before subjects and objects, before the division. If you think my words represented something incorrectly, okay. One can drop patterned experience and have full _awareness_ of unpatterned experience. Better? Does that win the Andre seal of approval? It's that or silence. I'm going to be away for a few days. Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
