Ham said:

All experience -- including its relative Quality or Value -- is dependent on 
the cognizant subject of our relational world.  WE are the agents who bring 
Value into being.  Without awareness there is no experience, hence no being and 
no knowledge.  ...I can appreciate that this concept is mind-twisting to a 
staunch Pirsigian. But if you understand what I'm saying, and reflect on it for 
a moment or two,...



dmb says:

That concept wouldn't confuse a Pirsigian. What you're maintaining here is what 
Pirsigians call SOM. That stands for subject-object metaphysics. SOM says that 
all experience is a matter of the cognizant subject being aware of the 
objective world, just as you said. But this is exactly what the radical 
empiricists denies. I think you really need to understand that the MOQ begins 
by rejecting this view that you're insisting upon. I show you once again. 
Please, please, please listen and understand what Pirsig is saying here....

"The second of James' two systems of philosophy, which he said was independent 
of pragmatism, was his radical empiricism. By this he meant that subjects and 
objects are not the starting points of experience. Subjects and objects are 
secondary. They are concepts derived from something more fundamental which he 
described as 'the immediate flux of life which furnishes the material to our 
later reflection with its conceptual categories'. In this basic flux of 
experience, the distinctions of reflective thought, such as those between 
consciousness and content, subject and object, mind and matter, have not yet 
emerged in the forms which we make of them. Pure experience cannot be called 
physical or psychical: it logically precedes this distinction.
In his last unfinished work, Some Problems of Philosophy, James had condensed 
this description to a single sentence: 'There must always be a discrepancy 
between concepts and reality, because the former are static and discontinuous 
while the latter is dynamic and flowing'. Here James had chosen exactly the 
same words Phaedrus had used for the basic subdivision of the MOQ.
What the MOQ adds to James' pragmatism and his radical empiricism is the idea 
that the primal reality from which subjects and objects spring is VALUE. By 
doing so it seems to unite pragmatism and radical empiricism into a single 
fabric. Value, the pragmatic test of truth, is also the primary empirical 
experience. The MOQ says pure experience is value. Experience which is not 
valued is not experienced. The two are the same. This is where value fits. 
Value is not at the tail-end of a series of superficial scientific deductions 
that puts it somewhere in a mysterious undetermined location in the cortex of 
the brain. Value is at the very front of the empirical procession." 


The hardest thing to grasp here is the notion that it is NOT the subject having 
the pure experience. Since the claim here is that subjects and objects are 
CONCEPTS derived from experience that's more primal and fundamental, logic 
doesn't allow this pure experience to be the experience of a subject. You can't 
derive the subject from the subject. The idea here is that the value at the 
cutting edge of experience is neither not to be found in the objective reality 
nor in the subjective evaluation of that reality but rather the quality of the 
whole situation before any conceptual sorting has occurred. Subjects and 
objects emerge only in the sorting process. They're great ways to sort things 
most of the time. As secondary concepts, they're fabulous. But as when they are 
taken as the ontological realities that make experience possible, that 
constitutes SOM. As you can see in the quote above, radical empiricism means 
rejecting that basic metaphysical assumption. 





                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/210850553/direct/01/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to