DMB and Group 20 March:
Andre had said to Bo: > You equate 'dynamic' with 'objective' and 'static' with 'subjective'. > This is not a good way to understand these terms, nor is it a good way > to understand to MoQ and reinforces my point above that you do not > understand DQ/SQ.( with all respect) I have NOT equated DQ/SQ with Objective/Subjective! This is what I accuse Pirsig of by introducing the Quality/MOQ "meta-metaphysics". He admittedly says (in the Summary) that Quality is dynamic and the MOQ is static but this is just a thin Q-guise over saying that Quality is the one real (objective) reality while everything written about it is something JUST or subjective. dmb says: > Right, if dynamic and static are equated to objective and subjective > then you've put the problem right back where it was. DQ/sq replaces > SOM. If they're equated, then you just have SOM replacing SOM. > Clearly, there is no point in doing anything like that. I couldn't agree more - this is my very point - only it's not me who do this, but the latter-day Pirsig by denigrating the MOQ to be "static" - totally nonsensical because it is the DQ/SQ "system"" Bodvar > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your > inbox. > http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID27925::T:WLMTAG > L:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:032010_1 Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, > Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
