Hiya John
The main reason that I wrote what I did was because Bo has a habit of
accosting new members with his SOL (hmm!) and then trying to make out
that Pirsig agrees with him. I've seen it happen too many times and it
tends to create a lot more confusion about Pirsigs MoQ than is
necessary. Bo leaped in very quickly and started a hatchet job on what's
discussed on this list and the evil academy so I pointed out the obvious.
That Pirsig and most on this list disagree with Bo isn't particularly a
problem - I've never tried to stop Bo putting forward his view of the
MoQ, I even published his SOL statement/essay on MOQ.ORG - but when some
on this list start complaining about the academic and more technical
side of philosophy and trying to make a bogeyman out of their work I
think it does become a problem.
Whatever your views on the academy and how they 'philosophologise' (!)
it's still a necessary area where the MoQ needs to be introduced and
maintained and Ant and Dave are doing a fine job. And yeah, I agree with
Arlo that Pirsig does support both Ant and Dave in their efforts to get
the MoQ into academia. When Ant received his PhD at Liverpool, Pirsig
was there to show his support for Ant - he and Wendy didn't travel
several thousand miles just for a couple of days sightseeing!
There's room here for many styles and points of view and I think it's
detrimental to Pirsigs work to let certain comments go
unchallenged.Ignorance may be bliss but only for the ignorant.
It also seems to me that most of those that complain about this academic
insertion and the big words and technical stuff are also the ones that
distort the MoQ the most. Interesting correlation maybe!
Cheers
Horse
On 14/04/2010 22:08, John Carl wrote:
arlo the puppy kicker sez:
"to suggest Pirsig would rather see this list devolve into a sporadic
collection of "random thoughts" swinging from "art is pretty" to "leftists
are bad" is something I would think would NOT be something he would rather
see here."
And scores! Because of course! Who would? We can judge pretty accurately
what Pirsig would want - Quality.
And I'd say more than anything that Pirsig would want people to pursue DQ in
their own sphere than ask "what would bob do" all the time.
And thus Platt's point about Pirsig NOT wanting "what would bob do"
academically codified, defined and warped into a static object of
intellectual encapsulation, is true. And it is in that vein that I think
Platt is closer to the heart than any reliance upon any static authority
figure. Be it Pirsig himself or any past-designated acolytes.
ahem.
But hey, I'm an evil academic, you know, one of the bad guys who values
learning rather than championing ignorance, so what do I know? I kick
puppies for fun.
And tell me, oh teacher of men, what increases learning? Arrogant
encapsulations of academic status, or humble seeking of truth?
At the very least, you need both.
John the arrogant encapsulator of humility
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
--
Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an
attractive and well preserved body, but to skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, wine
in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what
a ride!"... Hunter S Thompson
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
