Seems to me, mr boloni, that you're making the common mistake many make when analyzing the MoQ as a static hierarchical definer of value. With this view, since intellect is on top of the heap, any subordination of lower levels by intellectual values is justified.
This simplistic hierarchialism is more appropriate to a metaphysical system that values rigidity. I suggest you stick to Ayn Rand's Objectivism and desist in plastering such conceptual framework upon the MoQ which values the dynamic above all. We can't intellectually define which are the good humans and which are the bad. Many political systems have tried, all have failed. "If an intellectual man strives for social recognition so he can biologically feed his wife and kids, what level is highest value in this?" Me, quoting myself. John On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 3:56 AM, Tudor Boloni <[email protected]> wrote: > Since i didn't realize how smart most of the readers here are i will > simplify the question. > > If genetic enhancements make a class of super smart humans, and those > humans > come to understand that non-genetically modified humans are only capable of > lower quality Intellectual Patterns in comparison to their own Intellectual > Patterns, than would MoQ morality allow the transgenic humans to limit the > resources available to non modified humans, since those resources would be > better utilized by the transgenics? > > sincerely, > Tudor > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
