But Horse,

You failed to post the preceding sentence in which Pirsig blasts those 
who say the "MOQ is like Plato, Aristotle, Plotinus, James, Pierce, 
Nieztsche, Bergson, and many others" which is precisely what 
academics like Arlo and DMB do, not me or Bo. 

On 17 Apr 2010 at 23:26, Horse wrote:

> But Platt, Pirsig identifies you as one of the philosophologists in 
> Lila's Child Note 133 where he says:
> 
> Pirsig Note 133 Lila's Child:
> "...This kind of comparison is what I have meant by the term, 
> "philosophology." It is done by people who are not seeking to
> understand what is written but only to classify it so that they don“t 
> have to see it as anything new."
> 
> This is in response to you supporting Bo's SOL idea which he 
> categorically refutes in Notes 129, 131 and 133.
> 
> Why do you continue to ignore what he says?
> 
> On 17/04/2010 21:52, [email protected] wrote:
> > Hi Marsha,
> >
> > You've pinpointed the essence of the MOQ that the philosophologists
> > either ignore or haven't a clue. Thanks for your usual acumen in getting
> > to the point quickly, succinctly and accurately.
> >
> > You are indeed very wise.
> >
> > Platt
> >
> >    
> 
> -- 
> 
> Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving 
> safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but to skid in sideways, 
> chocolate in one hand, wine in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally 
> worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what a ride!"... Hunter S Thompson
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to