[Bo] > Quality must be higher than intellect because we > value our premises and concepts.
. [Platt] > the clincher argument for Bo's argument about the true nature of the MOQ. . [John] > here is the heart and soul of the MoQ . I don't think Bo's quote supports his view that intellect = S/O, rather the opposite, since the quote implies that intellect = premises and concepts. But is the argument itself any good? P1) We value our premises and concepts. C1) :. Quality must be higher than intellect. Obviously, the argument is invalid as it stands. It needs some further premises such as: P2) Intellect = premises and concepts. P3) Quality must be higher than what we value. So the whole argument: P1) We value our premises and concepts. P2) Intellect = premises and concepts. C0) :. We value our intellect. P3) Quality must be higher than what we value. C1) :. Quality must be higher than intellect. What is the support for P3 & why is it the "heart and soul of the MoQ"? Craig Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
