Marsha to Andre:

I do support Bo's point-of-view when if comes to the
intellectual level being SOM and the MoQ representing an emerging
Quality Level, but my choice of 'outer' and 'inner' has more to do with
seeing where the West and East focused their interest.  I could just
have easily written 'phenomenon' and 'mind'.

Andre:
Marsha, you are sometimes like the eel in a bucket of snot! You want to wriggle 
your way out of positions by appealing to DQ/SQ. But this makes your position 
seem superfluous which it isn't. This is a form of nihilism and you (as 
PoV's)have not emerged into this universal pattern for no reason.
Bodvar is the opposite and this makes it interesting: Bodvar places everything 
into boxes ( SOM, mind, intellect, language, emotions, etc). This is, for me, 
speaking truely from the 'objective' SOM point of view and the danger is that 
you lose sight of the nuances, the different emphases on important issues 
within a philosophical framework.

It appears to me that (for example) Bodvar does not distinguish at all between 
the MOQ's  'subject' and 'object' as (radically!) opposed to the SOM idea of 
S/O. Nuances, differences and shades of opinions are dismissed and immediately 
reduced to SOM!!!

Your 'mind'is just such an example. As though 'mind' is evil (concept) in 
itself. Mind is an intellectual derivative of direct, pure experience. And, may 
I hasten to add a construct by a very primitive sense of value.
We would be better off without the notion of 'mind' altogether and instead use 
the simple intellectual PoV ... but Bodvar, and you, it seems, appear to see 
and re-create, from tradition, this unfounded (because disproven) mind- over- 
matter thing or this 'objective over subjective thing. I really do not 
comprehend where this is coming from. Certainly not from ZMM or LILA! And if 
the argument is put that Pirsig himself is responsible for this then I would 
simply say: You saw it, I didn't; so where do you get it from!!?? (and I do not 
want a rehash of the ZMM chart. Lila has been revelatory in the nuance 
difference.

If you are really interested in the difference between the East and the Western 
interpretation of reality I really would recommend Northrop, as mentioned by 
Pirsig,  who considered himself a student of Northrop.

That is all.
Andre


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to