On Apr 30, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Andre Broersen wrote: > Marsha: > > Let's take, for instance, the pattern: horse. I understand horse to > be a biological static pattern of value. It's also best for me to > understand it as opposite-of-non-horse. By doing so I allow for > many individual's history of the pattern. If one individual's exposure > to horse has been only through books(words& pictures) it will be a > limited pattern. Another individual's exposure to horse may include > growing up on a horse ranch and it will be a much broader/deeper > pattern which most likely will contain smell and once bitten by a horse. > All aspects are conceptual whether then are thoughts, sights, smell, > sounds, tastes, touch. > > Concepts held in consciousness, whatever that may be. > > Andre: > The divisions are all yours Marsha...following this petsky (to use Bodvar's > term) intellectual pattern of value as encapsulated by SOM).
Mr. Pirsig may correct me any time he wishes, until that happens I guess I'm free to interpret using head and heart as best I am able. Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
