[ Marsha] > Let's take, for instance, the pattern: horse. I understand horse to > be a biological static pattern of value. It's also best for me to > understand it as opposite-of-non-horse.
I wonder if it is the best understanding for you or even a good understanding. What are biological non-horses for you: kittens, beetles, sharks, and so on? So if you were trying to understand the spov 'horse' & all you understood was that it was the opposite of kitten, beetle, shark and so on, would you have your current u nderstanding of 'horse'? I say no . Craig Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
