On May 2, 2010, at 12:32 AM, [email protected] wrote: > [ Marsha] >> Let's take, for instance, the pattern: horse. I understand horse to >> be a biological static pattern of value. It's also best for me to >> understand it as opposite-of-non-horse. > > I wonder if it is the best understanding for you or even a good > understanding. > What are biological non-horses for you: kittens, beetles, sharks, and so on? > So if you were trying to understand the spov 'horse' & all you understood > was that it was the opposite of kitten, beetle, shark and so on, > would you have your current u nderstanding of 'horse'? I say no .
> Craig Craig, Properly it should be opposite-from-non-horse. For me, the horse patterns is best represented by opposite-from-non-horse. The kitten patterns is best represented by opposite-from-non-kitten, and the justice pattern, by opposite-from-non-justice. It works for me yes. Non-horse would be all not considered horse, and that seems to me, would include kittens, beetles, sharks etc. Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
