Arlo On 5 May you spoke.
> There is a commonality to "intellectual patterns", but it is not > "SOM". You are attempting to use a species to define "all life". This was a pretty cheap way out, but as no arguments penetrates the Bensinger "panzer" OK. > As for your "quotes", they simply reflect the actuality of a dominant > SOM paradigm. Of course "society" saw "biology" as evil, and later > "intellect" saw "society" as evil. But this is not a "tenet", this is > a malady. OK, nothing would make the cardinals look through Galileo's telescope and nothing will make Arlo see. [Bo] before > I must add one observation. Some of these passages reveal a tendency > of the MOQ to sympathize (join forces) with society in a joint > operation to quell intellect... > [Arlo] > This is a horrible misinterpretation. The MOQ never sides with > "society" to quell "intellect", but it restructures "intellect" to > know when it should support "society" in its role to constrain > "biology" as opposed to seeing "society" as always something "evil". You did not understand my argument about the danger of a de- constructed - corrupted - intellect which is nothing else that SOM's "changing one's opinion". I should have known. Now, what about your interesting REALITY=QUALITY=REALITY input a few days ago, you shut up once you saw the implications of it. Why was that? Bodvar Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
