Hello again Andre, Rereading your post I saw this. It made me happy to see something concrete we disagree about to discuss. Cool.
> Mary: > Time is also a static pattern of value. The concept of beginning and > end, future and past logically had to have been the "first" static > pattern there was. > > This is because without the concept of time, there can be no change. > Change > requires comparison. Without a "prior", what would be the change? > > Andre: > Turn this 'logic' around' and you may begin to understand the static > intellectual pattern (arisen from dynamic experience) that gave rise > to the concept of time. > [Mary Replies] Come again? "Turn this logic around" to what? [Mary Replies again] Now I get it. You must view time as a static Intellectual pattern. I view it as a static Inorganic pattern. That would be a point of contention between us right there. Retreating to my black hole, ;) Mary Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
