On May 23, 2010, at 5:28 PM, david buchanan wrote: > > dmb says: > > Oh, for Pete's sake! It is Pirsig who compares the MOQ to James's radical > empiricism and he does so precisely because James does NOT take subjects and > objects as an unspoken assumption. He takes is at an artificial conception > that has plagued the history of philosophy. James is aligned with Pirsig > because he attacks that assumption. If i seem frustrated, it's because I've > posted the quote at the end of chapter 29 about 50 times and yet you, Bo and > Marsha treat James's ideas like its just something I made up. Again, it is > Pirsig who identified James as an ally. I'm just elaborating on that fact. It > would only take a few minutes to read chapter 29 of Lila. If you had an hour > for lunch, you could read it twice and still have time to think about it. If > you do that and you still think such comparisons are pointless, please let me > know.
dmb, I don't find your ideas significant. Maybe because I am not matriculated in your program of study. Or maybe because they just seem dead. Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
