Hello >The only appropriate socialism is local - people of the same > discrete biome taking care of themselves and their families and > their neighbors. Why should people all across America pay taxes so > Californians can have the highest welfare benefits in the country? The inherent > unfairness of liberalism actually promotes local individual autonomy.
Should the same concept of 'localism' also apply to advertisers that are created by an advertisement company in N.Y. to sell soap made in Chicago, to the residents of California. My point is, Communities across the country, and across the world, are being told what to buy and where to spend their money. In the end the profits are leaving the local towns, states, even the country from which they are being generated. I am not saying that taxes paid in one state or one country should support a welfare system in another. My point is should corporate influence be limited to the region they are in. Khaled ____________________________________________________________ Penny Stock Jumping 2000% Sign up to the #1 voted penny stock newsletter for free today! http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4c0a7f66363182663ccst04duc Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
