On 6/6/10 9:03 PM, "Mary" <[email protected]> wrote: <snip> > The > question, though, is if so many firmly believe IPOVs are 'symbol > manipulation', then at least one person should be able to explain how that > makes the Intellectual Level differ from the Social. What 'purpose of its > own' does symbol manipulation serve? That, at least, is where I would like > to start. > > Best, > Mary Hi Mary and all, Imho until evolution is tidied up a bit, it is impossible to put boundaries on the levels. I prefer to see evolution as levels in existence. How many different ways can a particle exist? For logic there has to be 1, a starting point. This is obscure since there are two ways to conceive of 1, SQ defined and 1, undefined DQ the level of evolution, difference,. Many bad questions may be on topic. ³What purpose of its own¹ does symbol manipulation serve?² One is a metaphysical term. Metaphysics creates logic undefined DQ, and embraces logic defined SQ. One is also an evolutionary term in that the boundaries of the different levels in the evolved individual are undefined DQ. A logical conclusion has two sources, mathematics and evolution. Pirsig saw that DQ undefined, SQ defined, was a more understandable division than the subject/object of traditional metaphysics. 1 is both undefined and defined. Undefined 1 DQ as Matt described in his DQ, DQ DQ, etc. essay is an answer to a questioned boundary. I appreciate that he was describing, in many ways, the undefined element in many questions like: What is evolution?¹ Joe
Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
