Hey Ian,

> First joining up the comment of Krim's you responded to here, with our
> "siding with Bush" discussion in the other thread.
> Krim made the distinction here : "the differences between not what but
> how liberals think".
> The "what" is the specific immediate tactical situation, the "how" is
> the strategic rhetorical process.

I think you're right to see the parallel, but I think wrong to 
strictly assimilate them in this way.  The distinctions of 
tactics/strategy and what/how are definitely parallel, but 
the what/how I was discussing with Krimel, I think, is at a 
different level some of the time.  For instance, wondering 
about what we should talk to with other people, "the what" 
or "the how"?  That's a tactical curiosity, which makes the 
what/how subsumed underneath the tactics half of the 
tactics/strategy.

We can alter the relationships between the two distinctions 
to generate different questions, but to just assimilate 
"tactics" to "what" is blur away the possibility of wondering 
(in a confusion of levels to make my point) tactically useful 
to talk about tactics.

Matt
                                          
_________________________________________________________________
The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with Hotmail.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multiaccount&ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_4
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to