On Jun 23, 2010, at 10:11 AM, Andre Broersen wrote:
Marsha to Andre: > > You are overlaying your patterns onto whatever Bo tries to explain. Your posts are a mirror of your own confusion. > > Andre: > Unfair Marsha, we can only use what the other person gives. > Marsha: Not knowing what is in another mind, you can only interpret his words. I cannot see inside Bodvar's head, > Marsha: Quite correct. I can only respond to the words he uses to try to express himself... > Marsha: Your response is your own history(individual static patterns.) which he has done now for over a decade. > Marsha: And you would what, strip away and diminish Bo, or my expressing our experience of the MoQ? Who are you to do this? Interpret away to your own hearts desire, that is wonderful, but allowing your ignorance of another's intent to discredit another's experience seems anti-Moq. Bo did not convince me of the SOL. I came to this fourth level understanding of my own investigation, and therefore joined with him in supporting the idea that the intellectual level has at its basis a formalized subject/object reality (SOM.) And what he is giving does not rhyme with the MOQ... as he admits himself. > I does not rhyme according to YOU. I am questioning this...fair enough? > The little that might be considered argument is weak; you are mostly attacking like a ignoramus. Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
