well if your advocating killing all intellectual patterns then your not taking your own advice.
Hypocritical I'd say dont practice what you preach ----- Original Message ---- From: MarshaV <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Mon, June 28, 2010 8:42:10 AM Subject: Re: [MD] The Quality/MOQ meta-metaphysics On Jun 28, 2010, at 8:12 AM, ARLO J BENSINGER JR wrote: > [Marsha] > Who has been designated the thought police and by whom? > > [Arlo] > Can the idiotic rhetoric. > > [Marsha] > Where does RMP _emphatically_ reject Bo's interpretation. All I've ever read > were weak suggestions that it didn't seem right. > > [Arlo] > Why would you even need more? If that (the SOL) is what he meant, he would > have > said so. Instead he said it "undermines the MOQ". > > What I don't understand is why its not enough for you SOMists to propose an > alternative to what Pirsig said, you have to convince yourself that despite > his > own denials, he is too stupid to understand what he really meant (you, of > course, in your brilliance, however, understand what he himself is too dense > to > see). > > So support Bo's MOQ. Love it. Shout "derned interlictials" from every hilltop. > But it is NOT Pirsig's MOQ, where he is clear that the intellectual level was > never proposed to be "SOM". RMP is vey, very clear where he writes: While sustaining biological and social patterns Kill all intellectual patterns. Kill them completely And then follow Dynamic Quality And morality will be served. (LILA, Chapter 32) ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
