Marsha and Platt and Bo all asked:
Name ONE intellectual pattern that is not SOM.
dmb says:
On top of the several named by Pirsig, I have posted quotes from a number of
philosophers wherein they specifically reject SOM. Hegel, Heidegger, Dewey,
James, Pirsig of course, Hildebrand, Stuhr, Rosenthal, Brown, Taylor, Hickman.
But I guess they don't count because they're "intellectuals" and by your
definition anything intellectual is SOM. They're screwing everything up, right?
Do you not see how this makes it impossible to reason with you? It doesn't
matter what anyone says because you understand this better than all the
philosophers in the world, right?
Where do you get the gall and what was thing about humility? Seriously. Why not
read a book or something? People besides Pirsig do talk about this issue, you
know? James and Dewey were completely unaware of the MOQ and yet they said the
same thing about SOM. Pirsig tells us this about James. What reason do you have
to disbelieve him about that? You have no REASON to dislike the other radical
empiricists.
_________________________________________________________________
The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with Hotmail.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multiaccount&ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_4
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
