which "you" are you talking to, dave? I know it ain't me, babe.
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:25 PM, david buchanan <[email protected]>wrote: > > Marsha and Platt and Bo all asked: > Name ONE intellectual pattern that is not SOM. > > > dmb says: > > On top of the several named by Pirsig, I have posted quotes from a number > of philosophers wherein they specifically reject SOM. Hegel, Heidegger, > Dewey, James, Pirsig of course, Hildebrand, Stuhr, Rosenthal, Brown, Taylor, > Hickman. But I guess they don't count because they're "intellectuals" and by > your definition anything intellectual is SOM. They're screwing everything > up, right? > > Do you not see how this makes it impossible to reason with you? It doesn't > matter what anyone says because you understand this better than all the > philosophers in the world, right? > > Where do you get the gall and what was thing about humility? Seriously. Why > not read a book or something? People besides Pirsig do talk about this > issue, you know? James and Dewey were completely unaware of the MOQ and yet > they said the same thing about SOM. Pirsig tells us this about James. What > reason do you have to disbelieve him about that? You have no REASON to > dislike the other radical empiricists. > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with > Hotmail. > > http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multiaccount&ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_4 > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
