Mary said to dmb:
I find this such an extraordinarily strange post. Mainly because I have no
idea who you believe yourself to be arguing with, or what, in fact, you are
arguing about. ... If you believe we _do not_ agree with the quotes, then you
fail to understand what we have been saying all along, and if you believe we
_do_ agree with them, then what was the purpose of presenting them couched in
terms that imply that in some manner we should be 'chastened'? As I said, this
post of yours is bizarre.
dmb said:
It's funny. I was trying to explain that I get frustrated when my explanations
have no effect and your response to that shows that my explanations have no
effect. Please imagine that I screaming and pulling my hair out. It's
frustrating because the quotes I posted contradict Bo's equation. They're
suppose to help you see that you have the wrong idea about "SOM" and
"intellect".
I'm SHOWING you that other philosophers reject subject-object metaphysics. By
taking a look at some of their conversations we can see more exactly what it
is, exactly, that is being rejected. Those quotes should have persuaded you
that SOM is not what you think it is. See, if you understand what SOM is, then
you will no longer be able to believe that it is equal to the intellectual
level. When you see what the actual problem is, then Bo's equation will lose
all it's appeal. Then you'll see that the whole idea is not even worthy of
debate. I hope that someday you'll look back at these opinions, disagree with
your former self and feel proud that you've grown.
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_1
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
