On 1 Jul 2010 at 10:05, Arlo Bensinger wrote: > [Platt] > Oh, oh. The spectre of censorship arises. Now the arbiters of "the > truth" threaten. Does your warning to sentence Bo to Siberia also > apply to me, Mary, Marsha and others who are at least willing to > entertain the idea that the Pirsig may be wrong? > > [Arlo] > I'm guessing you didn't even read Horse's post, or you're trying to > do your typical distortion bullshit. > > This has NOTHING to do with thinking Pirsig is wrong. I think Pirsig > is wrong about a few things. That is a VALID argumentative position > to hold. Say Pirsig is wrong, say Bo is right. No harm, no foul. > > The issue, as Horse clearly points out, is in the dishonesty that > Bo's ideas are somehow Pirsig's ideas. They are NOT. > > You say "other who are at least willing to entertain the idea that > the Pirsig may be wrong"... GREAT! Entertain away! I do. > > But that is not the issue. As Horse (and Ian, and others) make plain.
[Platt] A distinction without a difference as far as the issue of censorship is concerned. Much evidence has been presented that Bo's ideas are indeed the same as Pirsig's. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
