Interesting Matt ... responding to Ron, you used the idea of Horse as "benevolent dictator".
This is exactly what I meant by saying things like ... the time for fair and balanced debate was over .... drawing a line .... an executive decision .... since when was moderation a democracy, etc ... A decision to be supported by the very existence of a community with a moderator. The time for debate was the 8 years before (and no doubt the 8 years after) such an executive decision. I'd like to come back on the propagandizing aspect ... the meme spreading whilst being debated (dishonestly) .... but fear I will not have time the next day or two. Ian On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Matt Kundert <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Ron, > > Ron said: > I respect your call to inquiry. > > It brings up questions about the role of a community and > the responsibilities connected with that role. > > Also the question of maintaining and defending the > distinctions that define that community. > > Matt: > Yours was a very thoughtful piece of reasoning, and the > kind of thing I had in mind when I first wrote. there is still precedence > for an administrative > move on Horse's part, and it has to do with, roughly, > propagandizing. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
