[John]
Arlo, agree completely with your dislike of basing life upon carbon. It's too anthropocentric. I get a twitch whenever I encounter the term "fractal", since my ex-bro used it all the time.

[Arlo]
I used the term "fractal boundary" because I think as you zoom in on the line its not as straight as it appears. Fuzzy may be a better word. The boundaries are areas I find quite interesting, where there is a lot more to see than the "middle" of Pirsig's levels.

[John]
The difference between inorganic and life is that life reacts much more dynamically to its environment, no?

[Arlo]
Well, personally, I don't like that term in this context. I'd say "the difference between inorganic and biological patterns is that biological patterns have a greater repertoire of potential with which to respond Dynamically".

Does that distinction make sense? I don't think biological patterns can respond "more Dynamically", but I think they have a greater array of potential with which to respond Dynamically. Maybe I'm nitpicking again.

[John]
I think if we found some alien, non-carbon bit of matter reacting dynamically to its environment and our presence, we'd deduce life. And if this unknown life reacted in socially significant ways, we'd deduce sophistication. And if it displayed evidences of art, we'd deduce intellect.

[Arlo]
Agree completely.

[John]
I'd say the same for a computerized algorithm, and thus an MoQ test would be better than Al Turing's - for a computer can seem intellectual, but unless it seems social, it has no "being".

[Arlo]
I think this was the original point of discussion in the thread, no? Intelligence can't derive directly from biological patterns, even if we attribute replication (or some such activity) to software patterns, there would need to be a ground of sociality "first" before intelligence has the ability to emerge within that architecture.


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to