Magnus said > > I don't think there are any fuzziness at all, it doesn't matter how much you > zoom in. I've said this a couple of times, but I'll try to show it using > another analogy. > And I've replied to it twice already with ....
We're talking real shapes in the real world of physics, chemistry & biology (and higher), NOT Platonic shapes in Euclidian space. Where zooming in we find perfect straight lines and sharp corners. If you zoom in on a real square (Piazza San Marco) for example you will get a different experience, or a real hexagon the hexene ring of a DNA base .... the sides and corners have fuzziness. The real hexagon in a bee cell ... shaped by the jaws of myriads of bees .... think about it. Fit is about "how good" the fit is. Real shapes have the history of how they came to be, the interactions that caused them, not how Plato idealised them. Ian Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
