On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 11:26 AM, X Acto <[email protected]> wrote:
> Platt: > What question? > > Ron: > I'll repost it below > > > > [Platt] > Arlo says Pirsig could change his mind except about one of his opinions. > Duh. > > All the rest is just the usual insults, name calling, bombast and pomposity > with lot of armchair psychology > thrown in to question motives which only exist in a distempered > imagination. > As usual, there's no mention > of other supporters of Bo's position. The fear he's right is palpable. > > Ron: > Right about what? his own opinion, the affirmation of your own? > How can one be right about an interpretation? > [Platt] Right in that Bo's interpretation may reflect Pirsig's own which may have changed since his note in LC. > Clarity and consistancy, economy of explanation, those are > examples of how one might hold a more accurate interpretation. > > More accurate mind you. > > If all you have is interpretation as the base of your arguement > then one interpretation is just as good as any other. > > The question is, what makes one better than the other? > [Platt] Do you believe one interpretation is just as good as another? I don't. Bo's interpretation is better because it makes the MOQ more harmonious. > > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
