Hmmm! Not sure that makes sense as subset and subordinate don't equate
to each other.
Did you actually mean to say:
"By making the Intellectual level subordinate to the MOQ, thereby
avoiding the disharmony of recursion"?
On 26/07/2010 14:55, [email protected] wrote:
On 26 Jul 2010 at 14:28, Horse wrote:
Could you explain this further Platt as I'm not sure what you mean by the
Intellectual Level being a subset of the MoQ.
On 26/07/2010 14:10, Platt Holden wrote:
Bo'sinterpretation is better because it makes the MOQ more harmonious.
Ron:
Please explain how it makes the MOQ more harmonious.
[Platt]
By making the intellectual level a subset of the MOQ, thereby avoiding the
disharmony of recursion.
Hi Horse,
I used "subset" to mean "subordinate" as expressed by Pirsig in the Baggini
interview:
" I think you are right. Let's drop the word, "absolute," and simply say that
"And in fact the Metaphysics of Quality actually supports the subject-object
distinction as a subordinate part of its own structure." "
Hopes this answers your question.
Platt
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
--
"Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production deadlines
or dates by which bills must be paid."
— Frank Zappa
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
