On Aug 13, 2010, at 7:02 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > > [Craig, previously] >> If we want to explain the Grand Canyon by the >> pattern of the Colorado River, that pattern has to >> be in Arizona, not you or I. > . > [Marsha] >> Wouldn't the Colorado River and Arizona be other >> patterns of value that may have bits and pieces >> that interconnect with the Grand Canyon? >> I don't see a problem. > > > Agreed. When you see it like that, > there is no problem. > > [Marsha] >> In my understanding, patterns are ever-changing, >> interconnecting, relative and impermanent. > > . > Also agreed. > > Craig
Hi Craig, If I consider the Grand Canyon, all sorts of bits and pieces dance through my head. I've been to the Grand Canyon and felt it vastness and its silence. I have a visual sense of its shapes and color. If I stay with it, pieces of the Grand Canyon Suite move through my mind on braying donkeys. I can even remember, with a physical tingling, the adrenaline rush from being too close to the edge. Yet these memories are just bits and pieces of all that might comprised of such a pattern. It seems to me there is nothing finite about a pattern. It is nothing as confining as a dictionary definition or a description in an encyclopedia. For me it is a collection of habits, and bits and pieces of memory. Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
