On Aug 15, 2010, at 10:22 AM, Krimel wrote: > [Marsha] > The evolution that the MoQ references is the evolution of > static patterns of value. If you do not understand this, its > back to kindergarten for you ;-) > > [Krimel] > So you think that Chapter 11 isn't the result of Pirsig not know jack shit > about evolutionary theory? You think he was simply taking a well known term > and making up a completely new meaning for it? Interesting, that could > explain his use of Quality and Dynamic and Static and Value and who knows > what else as well. > > Great insight!
Greetings Krimel, Are you making fun of me??? I will need to reread Chapter 11, but I think RMP took a high value intellectual pattern, one of the hightest, a pattern that is very credible - evolution - and adapted it for the MoQ. I'll leave it at that. Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
