On Aug 15, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Krimel wrote: >> [Marsha] >> The evolution that the MoQ references is the evolution of >> static patterns of value. If you do not understand this, its >> back to kindergarten for you ;-) >> >> [Krimel] >> So you think that Chapter 11 isn't the result of Pirsig not know jack shit >> about evolutionary theory? You think he was simply taking a well known > term >> and making up a completely new meaning for it? Interesting, that could >> explain his use of Quality and Dynamic and Static and Value and who knows >> what else as well. >> >> Great insight! > > [Marsha] > Are you making fun of me??? > > I will need to reread Chapter 11, but I think RMP took a high > value intellectual pattern, one of the hightest, a pattern that is > very credible - evolution - and adapted it for the MoQ. I'll leave > it at that. > > [Krimel] > No, at all it's a brilliant analogy. Kind of like a farmer who a takes > a bull and adapts it for the farm by turning it into a steer.
Marsha: I just looked up the difference between a bull and a steer and I now know you're mocking me. I'll reread Chapter 11 anyway to see if there is more I can moo at you. ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
