[Marsha] An analogy of what you're requesting might be like asking someone to explain Quantum entanglement using Newtonian proofs. Of course dmb's trying to explain the MoQ using James texts is just as ridiculous.
[Krimel] I like James' distinction between percepts and concept. His treatment of them in Some Problems... is very good and worth your attention. But yeah, at some point it is time to move on. Many of the concepts that inform my understanding the MoQ didn't exist during James' time. [Marsha] I miss Bo. [Krimel] I mostly ignored Bo but I did respect the fact that he never whined about being attacked and could take it as well as he dished it out. I was content to file his posts unread and saw no reason boot him for being hardheaded. After all, if we lost all of the hard heads, who'd be left? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
