I like the Beatles with Pink Floyd video.
On Aug 25, 2010, at 8:38 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote: > Poetry beats sarcasm - 'cos Ian says so ;-) > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 1:33 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> "Cold hearted orb that rules the night >> Removes the colours from our sight >> Red is grey and yellow white >> But we decide which is right >> >> And which is an illusion" >> >> >> >> >> On Aug 25, 2010, at 8:27 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote: >> >>> Sarcasm 1 Content 0 ? >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 1:22 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Oh, and: Nice try. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Aug 25, 2010, at 8:16 AM, MarshaV wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ah well, it's Ian who decides when an issue is too contentious >>>>> to consider a wikipedia quote. >>>>> >>>>> So all I have to say is: that's interesting. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Aug 25, 2010, at 8:04 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Marsha asked of Krim ... >>>>>> >>>>>>> The MoQ is based on Darwin and the Tao? Anyone besides you think >>>>>>> that this is so? >>>>>> >>>>>> [IG] Yes, clearly. >>>>>> >>>>>>> First, evolution has changed considerably since the days >>>>>>> of Darwin's publications, and the evolution of species is quite >>>>>>> different than >>>>>>> the evolution of static patterns. >>>>>> >>>>>> [IG] Clearly again, the model of evolution has itself evolved as both >>>>>> Darwin and Pirsig would predict and continues to do so. I see no >>>>>> difference in the evolutionary processes .... I regularly use the word >>>>>> "species" to denote any static pattern. Species are "special" in the >>>>>> sense of being distinct, long-lived over multiple generations, and >>>>>> therefore self-sustaining, repairing / reproducing over many >>>>>> generations .... in all levels above the organic (not just >>>>>> biological). >>>>>> >>>>>> Clearly Darwin didn't have the benefit of a Taoist monism at the >>>>>> heart of his thinking .... GOF phyisicalist scientific objectivism >>>>>> only .... but see above. Neither Darwin nor Pirsig, nor any of us >>>>>> (their interpreters) have it 100% right, that would be terminal. I >>>>>> tend to be less critical of that fact, but I wouldn't argue for >>>>>> perfection. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ian >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ___ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list >>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >>>>> Archives: >>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ___ >>>> >>>> >>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list >>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >>>> Archives: >>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >>>> >>> Moq_Discuss mailing list >>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >>> Archives: >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >> >> >> >> ___ >> >> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >> > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
