> May i ask you to consider how all this additional dynamism does not lead to > chaos? > I agree dynamism increases and yet things don't fly apart at the slightest > touch. > It seems to me there is an intuitive feeling that the more dynamic everything > gets the more unstable everything would become, but it does not.
Oh but it does. Take ideas. Even good ones. Sometimes they die before birth, often stillborn given away ignored derided stolen lost discarded die Sometimes in less that a blink of an eye. Dave Hello Dave, Thanks for this because i think it encourages me. It's not easy for me to convey what i have in mind. In a sense i think you are right but i'm thinking about dynamic functions. These are static patterns that at the same time interface somehow with DQ. The ideas you speak about may be fleeting, but ideas that serve as dynamic functions are central to the metaphysics discussed here. Over the arc of evolutionary progress dynamic functions seem to be both stable and dynamic. This much is stated in Lila but i may not have understood what is being said. Thanks Ade Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
