Well, Dave, as i was reading the line of thinking in the postings; the word selective reductionism popped up in my head. Not that it is of any importance. But selective reductionism used incorrectly or improperly is a potential widget capable of preventing the opening of pandora's box called panpsychism, opening the field, the terra incognita--;the road ahaed of us. I think the message is , -expanding the field.
Had nothing to do , and searching for a quality pattern is a good option, better than surfing porn on the internet. Adrie, (correct me if you don't agree) 2010/8/30 david buchanan <[email protected]> > > It's so quiet here that I can hear crickets chirp. > > That's cool. I have work to do anyway. > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > -- parser Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
