On Sep 3, 2010, at 3:19 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > Ade, > > Archetypes are static patterns of value too. > > > @ Hello Marsha, > Archetypes are potential. I'm open to possibilities but i would have to give > quite a bit of consideration as to how potential is a static pattern. > Help me.
Hi Ade, I take it you are meaning they are potential in an individual. If so, the a static pattern event would be a potential in a individual based in their past experience (memory) with a pattern. Doesn't that make sense? Marsha > > > As far as archetypes go, I like the Myers-Briggs system of archetypes better > than Jung's, but they do have a relationship. > > > @ I think this may be a misunderstanding on your part. Archetypes are not > personality traits. > > > Do you have a quote or url where Jung seems to supports Bo's acronym? > > > Marsha > > > @ My information is taken from the Collected works of C.G. Jung. > I can try to give you page references. > By the way, i think there is a limit to the number of posts that mention > certain topics, and i don't want to be drawn over my quota. > Thank you > Ade > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
