> [Marsha] > Archetypes are static patterns of value too. As far as archetypes go, I > like the Myers-Briggs > system of archetypes better than Jung's, but they do have a relationship.
> > Do you have a quote or url where Jung seems to supports Bo's acronym? > > [Krimel] > You do know that the Meyer-Briggs test is entirely based on the personality > dimensions Jung laid out in his book "Analytical Psychology", right? They > have little to do with archetypes but both are Jung's. [Marsha] Okay, I was confusing personality types with archetypes. I suppose I jumped to that conclusion because of the mention of 'introverted' being an important Myers-Briggs type factor. Oh right, the shadow(Wendy's sewing task), anima, animus & self. It's been a long time. Sorry for confusion. Which Myers'-Briggs type are you? [Krimel] Measuring such a thing as personality is like flipping coins, reading entrails or claiming the swirling of old tea leaves is more or less prophetic than swirling new ones. I paid little mind to whatever test results I accumulated over the years. My personality type is whatever the people who interact with "it" say "it" is. I would say "it" is the type that either doesn't take tests or doesn't take them seriously when "it" does. >From where I see "it"; "it" is a Shadow. Some have suggested we'd be happier if I'd quit stitching "it". Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
