Hi Magnus, > 1. There's a big leap from valuing a division to suggesting it's a > whole new level. Especially since it demotes *any* written text to just > inorganic ink, and the human brain to mere biology. >
If this is a summarization of SOM, it is an incorrect one. I'm not aware of anyone who asserts anything remotely like this. If this is what you think it is, then I understand why you oppose it. > 2. Since you understood the stack concept, you should realize that the > S/O division only has value, actually only is real at all, in the human > perspective stack. The S/O division is not transposable to any other > stack, so it has little metaphysical value. > Many assertions of the MoQ are not directly transposable to any other stack. Does that mean the MoQ has little metaphysical value? Just asking. Best, Mary Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
